Tuesday 6th October | 10am - 12pm | Guildhall, London

We welcome our clients to join the Suade team for an morning of discussion, updates, and conversation with peers across the community.

During the forum, the Suade team presented a round-up of what has happened so far this year, what we have been working on, and the product updates currently in the pipeline.

Speakers:

Kira Snow, Senior Implementation Specialist, Suade

Florent Audigier, Head of Product, Suade

Date: Tuesday 23rd September 2026
Time: 12:00PM - 12:45PM BST
Duration: 45 minutes
Format: Live Webinar

We're joined by Kira Snow, Regulatory Reporting Expert at Suade, and Judy Zhu, Head of Regulatory Reporting at Bank of China, for a practical look at what Basel 3.1 means for capital and market-risk calculations, data and reporting processes and what "reporting-ready" actually looks like in practice.

The session will cover:

• What's changing under Basel 3.1, and why it's creating challenges across Finance, Risk and Regulatory Reporting
• Where banks really are in their implementation journey, and which aspects have proved harder than expected
• What needs to be in place now: clear data definitions, reliable lineage from source data to reported figures, and strong controls around change
• How to build a reporting model that lasts beyond the deadline and what lessons from Basel 3.1 should carry into the next wave of regulatory change

This taster session leads into Suade's full Basel 3.1 panel at the RegTech Forum on 6 October 2026, Guildhall, London.

This session is designed for regulatory reporting, risk and finance professionals at banks preparing for Basel 3.1.

New research explores how banks can prepare their data, controls and operating models for the responsible use of AI in regulatory reporting.

LONDON, 19 August 2026 - Suade and PwC Ireland have published a new whitepaper, Agentic AI for Regulatory Reporting: From Data to Decision-Making, examining how banks can introduce AI into regulatory reporting safely and at scale.

The whitepaper argues that agentic AI will only create meaningful value when it operates on structured, governed and interoperable data. As reporting requirements become more detailed and regulators increasingly move towards structured, machine-readable data collection, banks must establish strong data foundations before deploying AI across reporting workflows.

The paper explores how agentic AI could support several stages of the reporting lifecycle, including:

• Data validation and completeness checks.
• Exception management and issue triage.
• Audit-evidence generation.
• Regulatory-change impact assessment.
• The application of repeatable logic and relevant contextual information.

Across these use cases, the whitepaper emphasises the importance of human oversight. AI can help reporting teams automate repeatable activities, identify issues and surface supporting evidence, but accountability for material decisions should remain with appropriately qualified human experts.

“Agentic AI only creates real value in regulatory reporting when it operates on standardised, well-governed data within a clear control framework,” said Murat Abur, CIO and co-founder of Suade. “Firms that invest in robust data foundations, reusable logic and clear controls will be better placed to use AI safely as the technology matures.”

The whitepaper also considers the role of open standards and interoperable architecture in reducing duplication across reporting regimes. It highlights the Financial Regulation, or FIRE, Data Standard as a common, open specification for transmitting granular regulatory data.

Licensed under Apache 2.0, FIRE is designed to help firms establish a reusable semantic layer between internal systems and multiple external reporting requirements.

“There will always be humans in the loop, and that is an important part of any regulatory reporting architecture,” said Eamonn Clarke, Director, Reg Consulting at PwC Ireland. “Agentic AI can automate repeatable steps and surface better evidence, but accountability for material decisions must remain with human experts.”

The whitepaper is intended for senior professionals across regulatory reporting, finance, risk, data and technology who are assessing how to modernise reporting architecture without compromising governance, explainability or control.

Download the whitepaper

AI has the potential to change how regulatory reporting is delivered, but its value depends on the data, controls and architecture underneath it.

This whitepaper explores what banks need to put in place to use agentic AI in regulatory reporting in a way that is practical, explainable and well governed.

Download the whitepaper to explore how stronger data foundations can support the next stage of regulatory reporting.

Building the foundations for agentic AI

Regulatory reporting is becoming more detailed, data-driven and machine-readable. At the same time, many banks are still managing fragmented data, disconnected systems and reporting processes that are difficult to change.

The paper explores how banks can prepare for greater automation and the use of agentic AI by strengthening the foundations of regulatory reporting.

It covers:

• How standardised, governed and reusable data can support regulatory reporting
• Why interoperable architecture matters across multiple reporting requirements
• The importance of clear lineage from source systems to regulatory outputs
• How machine-readable rules and validation logic can support greater automation
• Where human oversight remains essential for decisions, exceptions and sign-off

About the authors

The whitepaper was authored by Murat Abur, CIO and Co-Founder at Suade, and John Dwyer, Partner at PwC Ireland.

It brings together perspectives on regulatory reporting, data standardisation and emerging AI capabilities to examine how banks can move from experimentation towards practical adoption.

September 24, 2026 | From 17:30 | New York, USA | Invite-only

With US regulators moving to modernise the capital framework while banks accelerate AI adoption, how should financial institutions rethink their data, regulatory reporting and technology foundations for what comes next?

Join senior banking leaders from Citi, AWS and Suade for an invite-only executive roundtable in New York, exploring how regulatory change is shaping the next generation of banking infrastructure.

Held under the Chatham House Rule, the discussion will provide an opportunity for senior banking leaders to share practical experiences, challenges and perspectives with peers across the industry.

Discussion themes

• US regulatory change and the evolving capital framework
  What does the changing US regulatory landscape mean for banks' capital, finance and regulatory reporting functions?
• Building stronger data foundations
  How can banks improve data quality, standardisation and accessibility across finance, risk and regulatory reporting?
• AI and the future of banking infrastructure
  As banks accelerate AI adoption, what data and technology foundations need to be in place to support responsible and scalable use?
• Transformation in practice
  What is working, what isn't, and where are banks seeing the biggest challenges in modernising their regulatory and finance infrastructure?

Who should attend?

The roundtable is designed for senior leaders across:

• Regulatory Reporting
• Finance and Risk
• Capital Management
• Data and Data Strategy
• Technology and Transformation
• Regulatory Change and Compliance

Join the discussion

Places are limited to ensure a focused, peer-led discussion. Join senior banking leaders from across the industry for an evening of candid discussion, shared experiences and networking.

Date: 24 September 2026
Time: 5:30pm–9:00pm
Location: The Cornell Club, New York

Join the conversation

Places are limited to ensure a focused, peer-led discussion. Register your interest below to join us.

OSFI has a habit of telling the market what matters next. For Canadian banks, that is useful. It gives the industry something it rarely gets enough of: a clearer sense of timing.

That does not make the work any less complex. It just makes it easier to plan, and in regulatory reporting, planning is half the battle.

Why the schedule matters

The value of OSFI’s quarterly release model is simple. It creates rhythm. Banks know when updates are likely to land, when Industry Day will follow, and when questions can still shape the final detail.

That matters because regulatory change rarely sits neatly inside one team. Capital, liquidity, interest rate risk, disclosures, treasury, finance, policy, and reporting often end up in the same conversation. OSFI’s release pattern gives those teams a chance to get aligned before the deadline pressure starts building.

It also signals something more subtle. OSFI is not just publishing guidance. It is showing how it wants the industry to work: earlier, more coordinated, and with fewer surprises.

The dates to watch

The next big marker is the September 2026 Quarterly Release. OSFI has already set out a substantial package for that date, including the final Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline for 2027, the revised implementation note on regulatory capital models, draft B-6 Liquidity Principles, the final B-12 Interest Rate Risk Management guideline, final Pillar 3 disclosures for interest rate risk, and the final guideline on capital and liquidity treatment for crypto-asset exposures.

That is not a small update list. It touches core balance sheet management, disclosure obligations, and the way banks think about risk in practice. For reporting teams, that means one thing above all: the implications will likely travel well beyond the policy function.

Then comes the November 2026 release, where OSFI has flagged draft CAR 2028 material and draft chapters of the Credit Risk Management Guideline. That suggests the capital conversation is not ending. It is shifting.

And in February 2027, OSFI has already pencilled in the next quarterly release, alongside another Industry Day. So the pattern continues. Release, review, respond, prepare again.

What reporting teams should do

The temptation with regulatory calendars is to treat them like background noise. That is a mistake.

The better approach is to read each release through an operational lens. What changes in the data? What changes in the controls? What changes in the sign-off chain? What has to be ready when the final wording lands?

That is where delays usually start. Not in the regulation itself, but in the handover between teams.

If a final guideline changes how an exposure is treated, or how it is disclosed, reporting teams need to be involved early. Otherwise the bank ends up retrofitting processes under pressure. That is when the work gets expensive, slow, and messy.

A smarter way to prepare

Banks that handle this well usually do a few things consistently.

They track consultation windows properly, not casually. They assign owners early. They bring policy and reporting together before the final text lands. And they treat implementation as part of the review process, not something to think about later.

That sounds obvious, but it is where many institutions still slip. The review starts, the document circulates, everyone agrees it is “important,” and then the real work gets pushed down the road. By the time deadlines are real, options are already narrowing.

A better habit is to ask, with every OSFI update, what it means in practice. Not in theory. In practice. What systems change? What evidence will be needed? What needs to be tested? What will the regulator expect to see if it asks questions later?

That is the difference between keeping up and staying ready.

What it signals

OSFI’s schedule is more than a list of dates. It is a signal about how the regulator expects the industry to operate. More predictably. More deliberately. With more room for discussion before the final version is locked in.

For Canadian banks, that is helpful. But only if they use it. The institutions that stay ahead will be the ones treating the schedule as a working tool, not a news page.

In 2026 and beyond, the real advantage will not come from seeing the release. It will come from being ready when it arrives.

23 September 2026 | From 17:30 | Toronto, Canada | Invite-only

Join senior regulatory leaders for an evening of peer discussion and networking, exploring how banks are responding to regulatory change, data transformation and the rise of AI. The discussion will be held under Chatham House Rule over a three-course dinner.

The discussion will explore:

• The evolving regulatory landscape: Basel Endgame developments, regulatory divergence and the implications for Canadian and global banks
• Capital optimisation in a changing regulatory environment
• Turning regulatory data into better business decisions
• AI, data and the future of regulatory reporting

This invitation-only discussion provides an opportunity to exchange perspectives with peers and explore practical approaches to improving regulatory reporting through better data foundations, technology and AI.

The ECB's Integrated Reporting Framework moves statistical reporting toward a single, granular model, while BIRD gives banks a reference structure for how that data should be sourced and processed.

This short guide explains why the shift matters now, where the implementation pressure will emerge, and what banks should assess before consultation turns into execution.

We are proud to share that Suade has been named one of the World’s Top Fintech Companies 2026 by CNBC and Statista.

Suade was recognised in the RegTech category for its work helping financial institutions modernise regulatory reporting and move away from fragmented systems and manual processes.

The recognition reflects our commitment to creating a more efficient and data-driven approach to regulatory compliance, supported by technology that gives firms greater control over their data, calculations and reporting processes.

Recognised among the world’s leading fintech companies

CNBC and Statista’s World’s Top Fintech Companies 2026 list features 500 companies across eight areas of financial technology.

For the fourth edition of the awards, Statista assessed around 3,500 companies using general and category-specific performance indicators. More than 25,000 data points were considered as part of the selection process. The companies are presented alphabetically within each category rather than as a numbered ranking.

This year also marks the first time that RegTech has appeared as its own category.

Forty regulatory technology companies were selected, representing 8% of the full list. The category covers businesses helping organisations meet regulatory obligations across areas including regulatory reporting, compliance, identity verification and financial crime monitoring.

The introduction of a dedicated RegTech category reflects the growing importance of regulation and compliance within financial technology. As financial institutions adopt new systems and explore the use of AI, they also need strong data foundations and clear controls to ensure technology can be used safely.

What the award means for Suade

Suade was founded to address one of the financial services industry’s most persistent challenges: how to meet complex regulatory reporting requirements without relying on disconnected data, manual calculations and difficult-to-maintain reporting processes.

Our regulatory reporting platform allows financial institutions to manage data, calculations and reporting within a controlled environment.

Built on an API-first and open architecture, Suade supports end-to-end regulatory reporting automation. It helps institutions reduce manual work, improve data accuracy and adapt as regulatory requirements change.

At the centre of this approach is the Financial Regulatory Data Standard, known as FIRE. FIRE provides a common specification for the granular data used across regulatory submissions, calculations and supervisory reporting.

By standardising information at the data layer, firms can create a more consistent foundation for regulatory reporting. This makes it easier to reuse data across reporting requirements, apply controls and trace information back to its source.

Why regulatory reporting technology matters

Regulatory reporting teams are expected to respond to frequent rule changes while delivering accurate information within strict deadlines.

For many firms, this work still depends on spreadsheets, manual adjustments and separate systems for different reports or jurisdictions. This can increase operational risk and make it difficult to understand how data has been changed between its source and the final submission.

Modern RegTech platforms give firms an opportunity to rethink this model.

Rather than treating each regulatory report as an isolated process, financial institutions can establish a trusted data foundation that supports multiple requirements. Calculations, validations and reporting workflows can then be automated while remaining transparent and auditable.

Suade enables firms to map data into a standardised structure and reuse it across regulatory requirements. This reduces the need for repeated transformations and helps reporting teams manage change more efficiently.

This foundation is becoming even more important as banks consider how AI could support regulatory reporting. AI can help with repetitive implementation and validation work, but outputs still need to be tested and reviewed by regulatory specialists.

Modernise your regulatory reporting with Suade

Financial institutions need regulatory reporting technology that can keep pace with changing requirements without adding more systems and manual processes.

Suade provides a single platform for regulatory data, calculations and reporting, helping firms strengthen control while reducing complexity.

Book a demo with our team to see how Suade can help modernise your regulatory reporting.

Book a demo with a RegTech specialist

See how Suade helps financial institutions modernise regulatory reporting, improve control and manage change with transparent, data-driven technology.

Book a demo

Date: Tuesday, 15th September 2026
Time: 11:00 - 11:45am EDT | 4:00 - 4:45pm BST
Format: Live Webinar

In March 2026, US regulators scrapped the 2023 Basel III Endgame and issued a re-proposal with lower capital requirements, changes to the GSIB surcharge, and a new approach to risk-weighted assets. With the June comment period now closed, this is no longer a "wait and see" issue for banks; it's a "prepare now" one.

Join Greg Goodall, Suade's regulatory reporting expert, for a live 45-minute session covering:

• Where Basel Endgame stands in the US, and what it means for bank capital
• Why most current data and reporting systems fall short
• How leading banks are rethinking their setup, including where AI genuinely helps
• The concrete steps to take over the next 1–2 years

This session is tailored for leaders from banking, regulation and technology looking to stay ahead of key industry changes.

Register below.